Andy Headworth at Sirona Consulting made a little tweet yesterday asking whether anyone had a document that explains the benefits of RPO to HR staff. As you can imagine, not many people put their hand up to send him one!
But why do we think that HR staff will be so anti-RPO... Because they see it as a threat to their jobs?
Like any outsourcing solution, RPO has got a place. And like other outsourcing styles, it has to be undertaken appropriately otherwise it will just turn into an expensive mess that simply doesn’t work.
The thing about RPO that has always surprised me is that people often think that it should either be done in a wholesale way, or not at all. This is wrong.
The process of recruitment is a long and complicated beast that touches almost every part of the business from senior managers or directors approving a hire, to designers putting ads together, through advertising onto hiring managers, across reference checking, etc... Lots of people, and lots of little areas can be helped with discrete RPO activity.
The bottom line here is that many HR staff (or in-house recruiters) would be happy to see certain parts of their jobs undertaken by somebody else – and lots of RPOs would be happy to do these admin intensive jobs on a transactional fee basis. Remember, HR staff should be adding value to their business, not shuffling paper around the place.
It’s important to realise that undertaking any kind of recruitment activity demands a system that can keep track of the admin. A good ATS can easily allow external providers secure access and visibility to parts of your process and this should be a consideration when considering using RPO as some or indeed all of your recruitment process.
- Mike